Midpoint Review - Content Feedback - Veteran Facing Forms - Patterns - Form submitter pattern

[KKitagawa-Bosch]

Next Steps for the VFS team

How did this touchpoint go? Give feedback on the Collaboration Cycle at any time.

• Assign this ticket to the team member(s) responsible for addressing feedback provided by Platform.
• Comment on this ticket:
  • If the Platform reviewer has any Thoughts/Questions that require responses.
  • When Must feedback has been incorporated. As appropriate, link to any other GitHub issues or PRs related to this feedback.
  • When Should/Consider feedback has been incorporated, or if any feedback will not be addressed. As appropriate, link to any other GitHub issues or PRs related to this feedback.
• Questions? For the most timely response, comment on Slack in your team channel tagging @platform-governance-team-members.
• Close the ticket when all feedback has been addressed.

Thoughts/questions

Feedback

Practice areas will document their feedback on the VFS-provided artifacts following the Must, Should, and Consider Framework. Platform Governance reviewers may also provide additional notes that don’t comment on the artifacts themselves but are important for implementation (eg. engineering/coding notes).

• Must: always use active voice. The copy in warnings is currently passive.
• Must: follow the word list guidance on the use of the term "accredited representative"
• Must: remove bold text per the VADS guidance

Governance team actions

• Format feedback as individual tasks (check boxes)
• Assign this ticket to the VFS team member that opened the Slack request
• Add the VFS team product label
• Add the VFS team the feature label (if applicable)
• Add the touchpoint labels
• Add the practice area labels
• Add the Collaboration Cycle initiative milestone