Compare confirmed ACT DR5 or DR6 cluster submap to simulated submap for same z, M

[evavagiakis]

To ensure our simulated submap is a reasonable representation of observed data, we should compare a confirmed ACT cluster (in DR5 or DR6 data) to a simulated cluster. For this comparison, we would use real ACT data at a given frequency (say 150 GHz) and in a given area of the map (based on noise level from accompanying noise map) to ensure our sims are in agreement in terms of inputs, then visually compare the submaps. Do they look similar, or does the cluster appear more visually prominent in the ACT submap? We could also compare the central y0 and aperture photometry measured dT of the images.

[evavagiakis]

@jhyoussef what was the status of your ACT data work at the end of the summer?