Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix the remote path in SSH when local is Windows #472

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Jul 25, 2024

Fix #471.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Improvements
    • Enhanced file path handling for better cross-platform compatibility in the upload process.
    • Improved robustness of temporary file path generation for SHA256 checks and file listings.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the ssh_context.py file enhance how file paths are managed in the upload and _get_files methods. By replacing os.path.join with pathlib.PurePath(...).as_posix(), the code now ensures that file paths are consistently formatted as POSIX paths. This improvement aids in cross-platform compatibility without changing the core functionality, focusing on generating temporary file paths for SHA256 checks and file listings.

Changes

Files Change Summary
dpdispatcher/contexts/ssh_context.py Improved file path management in upload and _get_files methods using pathlib.PurePath.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
ERROR when number of backward files > 100 in SSH context (#471) Uncertainty if file creation logic impacts the issue.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74b7579 and 6fc4217.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • dpdispatcher/contexts/ssh_context.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • dpdispatcher/contexts/ssh_context.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

dpdispatcher/contexts/ssh_context.py Show resolved Hide resolved
dpdispatcher/contexts/ssh_context.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dpdispatcher/contexts/ssh_context.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dpdispatcher/contexts/ssh_context.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 47.46%. Comparing base (1e9eb06) to head (6fc4217).
Report is 19 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
dpdispatcher/contexts/ssh_context.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (1e9eb06) and HEAD (6fc4217). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (1e9eb06) HEAD (6fc4217)
15 14
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #472       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   59.92%   47.46%   -12.46%     
===========================================
  Files          39       39               
  Lines        3845     3845               
===========================================
- Hits         2304     1825      -479     
- Misses       1541     2020      +479     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@njzjz njzjz merged commit 723f0b9 into deepmodeling:master Jul 25, 2024
26 checks passed
@njzjz njzjz deleted the fix-ssh-remote-path branch July 25, 2024 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ERROR when number of backward files > 100 in SSH context
1 participant