Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 5, 2024. It is now read-only.

Discussion Around Edge Processing #28

Open
MEBestawy opened this issue Apr 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Discussion Around Edge Processing #28

MEBestawy opened this issue Apr 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@MEBestawy
Copy link

In the pitch feedback, our partner mentioned that 3D res-nets would be too large for most cameras. What are other potential solutions other than the suggested hardware installation?

@MEBestawy MEBestawy added the question Further information is requested label Apr 8, 2023
@MEBestawy MEBestawy self-assigned this Apr 8, 2023
@MEBestawy
Copy link
Author

I would imagine that most places that have CCTV cameras have some desktop/ local network that they all connect to. So I think we can try to slim down our current design and have it run on the desktop rather than directly on the cameras.

@MEBestawy
Copy link
Author

We could also try an approach of prioritizing certain events over others. For example, normal activities don't need to be logged in real-time. We can take our time processing those. Whereas incidents will need to be detected immediately, thus needing a smaller model.

@MEBestawy
Copy link
Author

A third suggestion would be to use the edge hardware to just compress the videos. We then send the videos to our own servers to be processed how we like. That way is more costly for us, but it might the fastest if network delays are shorter than our processing delays on small devices.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant