Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Core] new_record for hard_deletes config adds is_deleted column to snapshots #6522

Closed
FishtownBuildBot opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #6558
Closed
Assignees
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content dbt Core The changes proposed in this issue relate to dbt Core dbt-core v1.9 improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear

Comments

@FishtownBuildBot
Copy link

FishtownBuildBot commented Nov 21, 2024

At a minimum, update body to include a link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates and what part(s) of the page you would like to see updated.
Originating from this issue: dbt-labs/dbt-core#10235
Pull requests: dbt-labs/dbt-core#10972 and dbt-labs/dbt-adapters#317

@runleonarun runleonarun added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear dbt Core The changes proposed in this issue relate to dbt Core labels Nov 21, 2024
@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 self-assigned this Nov 25, 2024
@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor

mirnawong1 commented Nov 27, 2024

To merge after Dec 5th

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 changed the title [Core] Docs Changes Needed from dbt-core Issue #10235 [Core] new_record for hard_deletes config adds is_deleted column to snapshots Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content dbt Core The changes proposed in this issue relate to dbt Core dbt-core v1.9 improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants