Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document the --static CLI parameter added in dbt 1.7.0 #4599

Open
1 task done
owenprough-sift opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Document the --static CLI parameter added in dbt 1.7.0 #4599

owenprough-sift opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: high Technical inaccuracy, missing/incorrect information, or broken links. Negatively affects workflows

Comments

@owenprough-sift
Copy link
Contributor

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/commands/cmd-docs

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

PR 8615 (dbt 1.7.0) added a --static CLI flag that influences the generation of the documentation site. That parameter should be described in public-facing documentation.

Additional information

No response

@owenprough-sift owenprough-sift added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear labels Dec 6, 2023
jbandoro added a commit to astronomer/astronomer-cosmos that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2023
## Description

<!-- Add a brief but complete description of the change. -->
Extends the docsOperator to make use of dbt `--static` flag. The static
flag is available from dbt 1.7>

I decided to add the flag through `dbt_cmd_flags`. Other options could
be a parameter or the `operator_args`.
There is no official documentation page from DBT on the flag
[yet](dbt-labs/docs.getdbt.com#4599). When
they do add it, I can trim down our documentation and link directly to
dbt.

I contribute to learn and am appreciative of any feedback.

## Related Issue(s)
closes #746 
<!-- If this PR closes an issue, you can use a keyword to auto-close.
-->
<!-- i.e. "closes #0000" -->

## Breaking Change?

<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, specify that here. -->

## Checklist

- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
required)
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works

---------

Co-authored-by: Tatiana Al-Chueyr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Justin Bandoro <[email protected]>
arojasb3 pushed a commit to arojasb3/astronomer-cosmos that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2024
## Description

<!-- Add a brief but complete description of the change. -->
Extends the docsOperator to make use of dbt `--static` flag. The static
flag is available from dbt 1.7>

I decided to add the flag through `dbt_cmd_flags`. Other options could
be a parameter or the `operator_args`.
There is no official documentation page from DBT on the flag
[yet](dbt-labs/docs.getdbt.com#4599). When
they do add it, I can trim down our documentation and link directly to
dbt.

I contribute to learn and am appreciative of any feedback.

## Related Issue(s)
closes astronomer#746 
<!-- If this PR closes an issue, you can use a keyword to auto-close.
-->
<!-- i.e. "closes #0000" -->

## Breaking Change?

<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, specify that here. -->

## Checklist

- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
required)
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works

---------

Co-authored-by: Tatiana Al-Chueyr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Justin Bandoro <[email protected]>
@matthewshaver matthewshaver added the priority: high Technical inaccuracy, missing/incorrect information, or broken links. Negatively affects workflows label Dec 5, 2024
@matthewshaver matthewshaver self-assigned this Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: high Technical inaccuracy, missing/incorrect information, or broken links. Negatively affects workflows
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants