Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CT-1039] Snowflake: Configuration of virtuell warehouses for tests #233

Closed
Kratzbaum92 opened this issue Aug 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Kratzbaum92
Copy link

Describe the feature

Extend the configuration of virtuell warehouses to tests.
https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/resource-configs/snowflake-configs#configuring-virtual-warehouses

ATM it's only possible to configure an explicit warehouse to explicit models.
In a scenario with many small models + 2-3 big models (data volume/ runtime) you would probably go to environmental config like this:

environment: PRODUCTION
warehouse: SMALL

  • virtuell warehouse ( for big models ): XL

Problem: It's not possible to influence the runtime of tests on your big model without changing the standard warehouse, which would potentially lead to a massive cost increase.

Describe alternatives you've considered

It would be possible to write tests as models and to test against these.

Problem: unnecessary models in repo and lineage

Additional context

Please include any other relevant context here.

Who will this benefit?

Cost sensitive customers.

Are you interested in contributing this feature?

Let us know if you want to write some code, and how we can help.

@Kratzbaum92 Kratzbaum92 added enhancement New feature or request triage labels Aug 15, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Snowflake: Configuration of virtuell warehouses for tests [CT-1039] Snowflake: Configuration of virtuell warehouses for tests Aug 15, 2022
@Fleid Fleid self-assigned this Aug 22, 2022
@Fleid
Copy link
Contributor

Fleid commented Aug 22, 2022

Hi @Kratzbaum92, this sounds similar to issue #23 .
Can you confirm this is indeed the case? Thanks!

@Kratzbaum92
Copy link
Author

Hi @Kratzbaum92, this sounds similar to issue #23 .
Can you confirm this is indeed the case? Thanks!

Yes, It's the same topic.

@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the confirmation! Let's close in favor of that other issue. I just left a comment laying out what I see as the next steps there.

@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants