Move Macro Type Analysis Code to dbt-common

[peterallenwebb]

Description

This changeset moves type checking code into dbt-common, and extends it to support checks for "dbt Classes" used by adapters, like Relation and Column.

Taken by itself, this changeset doesn't do anything, but it will be used by dbt-core soon to implement type checking.

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
• I have signed the CLA
• I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
• I have opened an issue to add/update docs, or docs changes are not required/relevant for this PR
• I have run changie new to create a changelog entry

[github-actions]

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.07299% with 41 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.20%. Comparing base (2253401) to head (7b081b3).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
dbt_common/clients/jinja_macro_call.py	70.58%	40 Missing ⚠️
dbt_common/clients/jinja.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #230      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.89%   69.20%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          52       53       +1     
  Lines        3433     3569     +136     
==========================================
+ Hits         2365     2470     +105     
- Misses       1068     1099      +31     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	69.20% <70.07%> (+0.31%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[peterallenwebb]

Pausing this set of changes as we re-asses the long term direction.