You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, in my department, we use exclusively databricks for our data analysis needs and we have an entire product built around running multi-task databricks jobs with several dbutils.notebook.run()calls and a lot of dbutils.widgets in each task to pass around parameters between the notebooks.
Now, I much prefer to code in my local IDE and we do have a repo for the project, but one of the annoyances is that the dbutils.*()calls and the notebook-specific functions (such as display()) will be highlighted as undefined by my IDE.
My question is, would it make sense to use dbx or would it just be more hassle without solving my issues?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
So, in my department, we use exclusively databricks for our data analysis needs and we have an entire product built around running multi-task databricks jobs with several
dbutils.notebook.run()
calls and a lot ofdbutils.widgets
in each task to pass around parameters between the notebooks.Now, I much prefer to code in my local IDE and we do have a repo for the project, but one of the annoyances is that the
dbutils.*()
calls and the notebook-specific functions (such asdisplay()
) will be highlighted as undefined by my IDE.My question is, would it make sense to use
dbx
or would it just be more hassle without solving my issues?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions