-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename components
directory to resources
under .dapr directory
#1148
Comments
Sounds good!
|
Agreed with one small change. Only when default dir is used, will the deprecation notice be printed i.e. for |
In this case, shall we warn and copy files to
Out of scope for this issue? |
It is being covered in #1012 |
Based on the above suggestions -
|
this looks good to me. |
/assign |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged (pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved) or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Have triaged this to be completed in 1.11 |
Describe the proposal
The issue #953 layout a proposal for using
resources-path
flag withdapr run
instead ofcomponents-path
flag and slowly deprecating it.In the similar context it would make sense to rename
components
directory toresources
and slowly deprecatecomponents
directory use.Since the
components
directory is heavily used and exists from beginning so, migrating fromcomponents
toresources
directly should be done in a phased manner.We can use this issue to discuss different approaches for this issue.
Release Note
RELEASE NOTE:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: