-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
cited.html
69 lines (64 loc) · 5.5 KB
/
cited.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width">
<title>Cited</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/basscss.min.css">
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/d3/d3.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery/jquery-2.1.4.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/plotly/plotly.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/internal/baseball.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/templates.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/ga.js"></script>
<link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/png" href="/favicon.png">
<style type="text/css">
.double{
display: inline-block;
}
.double img{
width: 150%;
}
hr {
display: block;
margin-top: 0.5em;
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
border-style: inset;
border-width: 1px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="navHeader"></div>
<section class="container px2 py3">
<h1 class="mt0">Citations</h1>
<p>Collection of where my work has been featured:</p>
<div class="clearfix mxn2">
<div class="px2 col col-12">
<h2><a href="https://medium.com/@dannypage/stop-using-google-trends-a5014dd32588" target="_blank">Google Trends</a></h2>
<p><strong><a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/read/stop-using-google-trends" target="_blank">Motherboard</a> [Danny Page]</strong> - Republished in whole. (With a more clever image, thanks to <a href="https://twitter.com/emanuelmaiberg" target="_blank">Emanuel Maiberg</a>)</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://theringer.com/was-that-google-trends-brexit-story-legit-2df9547a285c#.37ksqffbn" target="_blank">The Ringer</a> [Kate Knibbs]</strong> - <em>"You know what else started Google Trending during this time? Google Trends!"</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://lifehacker.com/why-you-shouldnt-trust-sensational-stories-about-google-1782661475" target="_blank">Lifehacker</a> [Eric Ravenscraft]</strong> - <em>"As developer Danny Page explains on Medium, Google Trends shows relative search volume over time, but doesn’t show exactly how many people are searching for a certain term."</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://fredrikdeboer.com/2016/06/26/everyone-is-reading-that-infographic-incorrectly/" target="_blank">Fredrik deBoer</a></strong> - <em>"For god’s sake, stop running Google trend stories!"</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/24/google_what_is_eu_post_results_search_surge/" target="_blank">The Register</a> [Gavin Clarke]</strong> - <em>"It's a good idea to treat Google Trends with a pinch of salt."</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/06/27/were-brits-really-googling-what-is-the-eu-after-voting-to-leave/" target="_blank">The Telegraph</a> [Cara McGoogan]</strong> - <em>"But it appears that the number of people actually searching "What is the EU?" was minimal."</em></p>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="px2 col col-12">
<h3><a href="https://medium.com/@dannypage/expected-goals-just-don-t-add-up-they-also-multiply-1dfd9b52c7d0#.h5zbx9kgf" target="_blank">Expected Goals</a></h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://statsbomb.com/2016/04/explaining-and-training-shot-quality/" target="_blank">Stats Bomb</a> <a href="https://www.twitter.com/mixedknuts/" target="_blank">[Ted Knutson]</a> </strong> - <em>"Consistently creating fewer, higher quality chances lowers the variance in scoring output."</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://frontoffice.report/arsenal-and-what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-expected-goals/" target="_blank">Front Office Report</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/RWhittall" target="_blank">[Richard Whittall]</a> </strong> - <em>"This is an extreme example, but even when you bring in the idea of looking at xGs as revealing a range of probable outcomes for single games (as per Danny Page, not that he would advocate that necessarily), I think we’re risking reducing football to something that, well, doesn’t resemble football."</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://2plus2equals11.com/2015/12/16/on-single-match-expected-goal-totals/" target="_blank">2+2=11</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/WillTGM" target="_blank">[@WillTGM]</a> </strong> - <em>"The importance of accounting for the differing outcomes when there are significant differences in the quality of chances in a given match."</em></p>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="px2 col col-12">
<h2><a href="https://dannypage.github.io/expected_goals.html" target="_blank">Expected Goals Match Simulator</a></h2>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/04/the-pros-and-cons-of-soccers-favourite-advanced-st.html" target="_blank">Paste Magazine</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/RWhittall" target="_blank">[Richard Whittall]</a></strong> - <em>"It tells us that it was the most probable outcome among a range of score lines based on the shot types."</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://oneshortcorner.wordpress.com/2016/04/13/football-analytics-part-six-resources/" target="_blank">One Short Corner</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/oneshortcorner/" target="_blank">[@oneshortcorner]</a></strong> - <em>"Danny Page wrote this a while ago on expected goals. His xG simulator calculates the probability of a result occurring based on the xG value of the shots that occurred in the game."</em></p>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<div id="navFooter"></div>
</body>
</html>