the road to 2.3.0 #1584
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
I think I knocked out #1559, which turned out to be a real issue, or at least related to a real issue. I'm pretty surprised that bug has been there for so long, but I guess you did need a resize + scaling, and why would you resize if you were then just going to scale anyway? Either way thanks @joseluis for flushing this out. One bug has been found and fixed regarding #1580, and I'm hoping there's at least one more. I'm not calling this done until I have a rigorous unit test on it. How I hope it's somehow responsible for #1557, but that's looking less likely. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
working on #1440 now, expecting to have it done tomorrow. i think these remaining issues will get handled over the course of next week, and we're looking for a May Day 2.3.0 release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
2021-05-09: 2.3.0 has been released. Locking. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Remaining issues for 2.3.0, priorities, flow:
visual render always fails after a visual resize #1559 handled except for bitmaps less than 6 rows talldraw sprixels bottom-to-top #1575 has to get fixed, and we need ensure it introduces no breakage -- i saw somedon't allow arbitrary sprixel placement within a plane #1572 let's first decide policy here, and put it into placesixel deepclean isn't entirely accurate #1580 fix up deepcleanit's possibly causing yield demo's text pulses in sixel terminals #1557 (narrator: it was not causing yield demo's text pulses in sixel terminals #1557)need restore bitmaps when no longer occluded #1440 is the last big bit of work, depends on don't allow arbitrary sprixel placement within a plane #1572nctree needs to support collapse/expand internally #1366 is unrelated to bitmap stuff, and just needed for raptorial"view" demo's picture-in-a-picture is printed on top line rather than second #1577 has to get fixed, or else we need tear out theview
PIP chrome, independent of others✅
#1557 worries me. if it's not due to sixel editing slipups, i really have no idea why it's happening. we don't see this flicker anywhere but XTerm, yet i can't help but think it's our bug. i don't think it needs to be a blocker for 2.3.0, but goddamn, i hate it.✅
we should look into #1538 and figure out what the story is there.so i'm thinking we're at least a week out. i'd love to have
#1559,#1575, and#1572wrapped up by tomorrow (friday) evening. i don't want to burn my entire weekend on notcurses, but figure#1580gets done sunday.#1440and #1531 will both be pains in the ass, figure two to six hours each.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions