Suggested rewrite / new concept for summarizers / exctractors

[zielperson]

I have been looking at a lot of the patterns, and have also used the prompting style (markdown, structure) in my own..
However, I do have a concern with some of the patterns, namely info extractors and summarizers.

Main concern

When looking at prompts like extract_article_wisdom or summarize I find these needlessly pre-sentient and constrictive:

Example from summarize

[...]

You extract the top 20 ideas from the input in a section called IDEAS:.

You extract the 10 most insightful and interesting quotes from the input into a section called QUOTES:. Use the exact quote text from the input.
[...]

This sets a minimum of 20 ideas and 10 quotes.

I barely find an article or study with this amount of new, noteworthy stuff.

Proposal

Use less restrictive language, especially as we don't know hpow many new ideas, concepts, etc.. are coming out of that text.

[...]
2. You extract the key ideas from the input in a section called IDEAS:.

3. You extract the most insightful and interesting quotes from the input into a section called QUOTES:. Use the exact quote text from the input.
[...]