From 8fc20645a44e5318c7acb80de72eb4d6053f291c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Andrews Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:41:43 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in docs/StringDesign.rst --- docs/StringDesign.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/StringDesign.rst b/docs/StringDesign.rst index 08f135206e4a0..50664b47d8d52 100644 --- a/docs/StringDesign.rst +++ b/docs/StringDesign.rst @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ Indexing cached, although not in the memory block where the characters are stored, since we want a ``String`` to share storage with its slices. Since the body of the ``String`` must already store the - ``String``\ 's *byte length*, cacheing the ``length`` would + ``String``\ 's *byte length*, caching the ``length`` would increase the footprint of the top-level String object. Finally, even if ``length`` were provided, doing things with ``String`` that depend on a specific numeric ``length`` is error-prone.