You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@ThierryGoubier published the following for Pharo-6.0: #201 (comment). The original issue has to do with the fact that Monticello does not allow two packages to share a common Prefix: 'AAA' and 'AAA-BBB' are not allowed to co-exist in an image ... In Pharo5.0 at some unknown point in time, Pharo began allowing packages named 'AAA' and 'AAA-BBB' to exist ....
Anyway, the issues with 'AAA' and 'AAA-BBB' related to the calculation of package membership based on pattern matching in class categories and method protocol are not really relevant here, except for the fact that @ThierryGoubier patch might actually be addressing some other issue and I'm dropping off the issue to see if the Squeak and GemStone variants need patching as well ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@ThierryGoubier published the following for Pharo-6.0: #201 (comment). The original issue has to do with the fact that Monticello does not allow two packages to share a common Prefix: 'AAA' and 'AAA-BBB' are not allowed to co-exist in an image ... In Pharo5.0 at some unknown point in time, Pharo began allowing packages named 'AAA' and 'AAA-BBB' to exist ....
Anyway, the issues with 'AAA' and 'AAA-BBB' related to the calculation of package membership based on pattern matching in class categories and method protocol are not really relevant here, except for the fact that @ThierryGoubier patch might actually be addressing some other issue and I'm dropping off the issue to see if the Squeak and GemStone variants need patching as well ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: