Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The orchestrator log needs more information on each line #33

Open
jackjansen opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

The orchestrator log needs more information on each line #33

jackjansen opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jackjansen
Copy link
Contributor

If we look at the log file in #32 for example there is not enough information about what was happening. At the very least there needs to be something that shows which connection this line belongs to. One possibility is to add something like ::ffff:192.168.0.1. But if that is difficult (I don't know if you have access to that information when you print the log line) you could also give each new connection a unique "connection number".

(But note that I'm using #32 here only as an example: I think that the specific error reported there doesn't have a lot to do with the orchestrator).

@jackjansen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually: if you do something like a "connection number" you could report it back to the client. The client could then print it in its log file.

Then, after a session, we could download the orchestrator log and filter it on the relevant connection numbers, and we'd have all the orchestrator log that pertains to the session.

@jackjansen
Copy link
Contributor Author

There also seems to be information missing on things that orchestrator decides to do. For example, around 09:44:50.805 I think the orchestrator decided to close the session, because the admin has left. But this isn't reflected by a log line.

@jackjansen
Copy link
Contributor Author

And the [SENDDATA] Missing parameters also isn't very helpful...

@jackjansen
Copy link
Contributor Author

I get the impression that [REMOVEDATASTREAM] only prints a message if something goes wrong (online [DECLAREDATASTREAM]).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants