-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reconsider TrueCrypt #107
Comments
It did not become insecure overnight / expiry date explosion of mold on the stroke of midnight :) Lets review: http://istruecryptauditedyet.com/ and decide, on balance, if the tool is still useful and also I am quite certain the tool will have a life after this milestone in its history. |
Direct link to first partial audit/report: https://opencryptoaudit.org/reports/iSec_Final_Open_Crypto_Audit_Project_TrueCrypt_Security_Assessment.pdf |
TrueCrypt has been audited as of 2 April 2015. http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2015/04/truecrypt-report.html |
After the recent TrueCrypt security hole would it make sense to remove the section on TrueCrypt in Disk Encryption? Or maybe see if VeraCrypt has the same vulnerability and switch endorsements? |
I would second the endorsement of TrueCrypt for non-Windows-machines. And VeraCrypt for those people stuck on Windows as they fixed the 2 bugs according to changelog. |
In light of recent events, we should reconsider endorsement of TrueCrypt:
Please update this thread with any new information on the matter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: