You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
rstatix::anova_test() is a very convenient function when performing any kinds of anova test designs.
I was wondering if there would be any way for papaja::apa_print() function to support rstatix::anova_test() objects so that users can easily create well-formatted anova stats and table in accordance with APA guideline.
This looks interesting. We currently have a feature hold leading up to the (eventual) CRAN release, but this may be worth considering for a future release. A couple of thoughts:
The internal workflow of the apa_print() methods heavily relies on broom. If rstatix-output is broom-able this would simplify things a lot.
For ANOVA specifically, we support afex-output, a package that similarly provides wrappers for ANOVA. From skimming the code, it looks like rstatix, like afex usescar::Anova. If the corresponding objects are similarly available from the output it may be easy to add support for this particular analysis model.
Given that this issue has been stale for a long time, I will close it. If there is continued interest, we are happy to review a PR or reopen the discussion.
rstatix::anova_test()
is a very convenient function when performing any kinds ofanova
test designs.I was wondering if there would be any way for
papaja::apa_print()
function to supportrstatix::anova_test()
objects so that users can easily create well-formatted anova stats and table in accordance with APA guideline.@kassambara, would you mind supporting
papaja::apa_print()
collaboratively?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: