Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[android] Not a Multi Manu data #27

Open
mrquincle opened this issue Apr 9, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

[android] Not a Multi Manu data #27

mrquincle opened this issue Apr 9, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@mrquincle
Copy link

Currently ScanRecord is complaining 10 times a second about the following.

04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4310 D ScanRecord: parseFromBytes
04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4310 D ScanRecord: first manudata for manu ID
04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4310 D ScanRecord: Not a Multi Manu data
04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4310 D ScanRecord: Not a Multi Manu data
04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4310 D ScanRecord: Not a Multi Manu data
04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4310 D ScanRecord: Not a Multi Manu data
04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4310 D ScanRecord: parseFromBytes
04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4310 D ScanRecord: first manudata for manu ID
04-09 12:31:48.467  3910  4631 D BtGatt.ContextMap: sendClientScanResult for app id 5
04-09 12:31:48.467 25989 25999 D ScanRecord: parseFromBytes
04-09 12:31:48.467 25989 25999 D ScanRecord: first manudata for manu ID

Process 3910 complains about Not a Multi Manu data, process 25989 does not seem to be bothered by it.

Part of getprop:

[ro.build.PDA]: [G901FXXS1CPK2]
[ro.build.changelist]: [7582628]
[ro.build.characteristics]: [phone]
[ro.build.date]: [Mon Nov  7 15:47:33 KST 2016]
[ro.build.date.utc]: [1478501253]
[ro.build.description]: [kccat6xx-user 6.0.1 MMB29M G901FXXS1CPK2 release-keys]
[ro.build.display.id]: [MMB29M.G901FXXS1CPK2]
[ro.build.fingerprint]: [samsung/kccat6xx/kccat6:6.0.1/MMB29M/G901FXXS1CPK2:user/release-keys]
[ro.build.flavor]: [kccat6xx-user]
[ro.build.hidden_ver]: [G901FXXS1CPK2]
[ro.build.host]: [SWHE7714]
[ro.build.id]: [MMB29M]
[ro.build.official.release]: [true]
[ro.build.product]: [kccat6]
[ro.build.scafe]: [americano]
[ro.build.scafe.cream]: [white]
[ro.build.scafe.shot]: [single]
[ro.build.scafe.size]: [short]
[ro.build.scafe.version]: [2015A]
[ro.build.selinux]: [1]
[ro.build.selinux.enforce]: [1]
[ro.build.tags]: [release-keys]
[ro.build.type]: [user]
[ro.build.user]: [dpi]
[ro.build.version.all_codenames]: [REL]
[ro.build.version.base_os]: [samsung/kccat6xx/kccat6:6.0.1/MMB29M/G901FXXU1CPG3:user/release-keys]
[ro.build.version.codename]: [REL]
[ro.build.version.incremental]: [G901FXXS1CPK2]
[ro.build.version.preview_sdk]: [0]
[ro.build.version.release]: [6.0.1]
[ro.build.version.sdk]: [23]
[ro.build.version.sdl]: [2301]
[ro.build.version.security_patch]: [2016-11-01]

Logging:

cat /etc/bluetooth/bt_stack.conf                              
# Enable BtSnoop logging function
# valid value : true, false
BtSnoopLogOutput=true

# BtSnoop log output file
BtSnoopFileName=/sdcard/Android/data/btsnoop_hci.log

# Preserve existing BtSnoop log before overwriting
BtSnoopSaveLog=true

# Enable trace level reconfiguration function
# Must be present before any TRC_ trace level settings
TraceConf=true

# Trace level configuration
#   BT_TRACE_LEVEL_NONE    0    ( No trace messages to be generated )
#   BT_TRACE_LEVEL_ERROR   1    ( Error condition trace messages )
#   BT_TRACE_LEVEL_WARNING 2    ( Warning condition trace messages )
#   BT_TRACE_LEVEL_API     3    ( API traces )
#   BT_TRACE_LEVEL_EVENT   4    ( Debug messages for events )
#   BT_TRACE_LEVEL_DEBUG   5    ( Full debug messages )
#   BT_TRACE_LEVEL_VERBOSE 6    ( Verbose messages ) - Currently supported for TRC_BTAPP only.
TRC_BTM=3
TRC_HCI=2
TRC_L2CAP=4
TRC_RFCOMM=2
TRC_OBEX=2
TRC_AVCT=2
TRC_AVDT=2
TRC_AVRC=2
TRC_AVDT_SCB=2
TRC_AVDT_CCB=2
TRC_A2D=2
TRC_SDP=4
TRC_GATT=2
TRC_SMP=2
TRC_BTAPP=4
TRC_BTIF=4
TRC_GAP=4
TRC_BNEP=2
TRC_PAN=2

Expected: properly handled beacon messages without filling the logs with errors.

@vliedel
Copy link
Contributor

vliedel commented Apr 10, 2017

Which processes were 3910 and 25989?

@mrquincle
Copy link
Author

You mean you think it's different processes involved. In this case that might be possible. I had the Nordic app and the Crownstone app running for a while.

@AlexDM0
Copy link
Contributor

AlexDM0 commented Oct 26, 2021

is this still an issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants