-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Troubleshooting: Provide concise troubleshooting guidelines #55
Conversation
74f1585
to
43f5094
Compare
43f5094
to
a60921b
Compare
::::{grid} 1 2 2 2 | ||
|
||
:::{grid-item-card} {material-outlined}`download_for_offline;1.4em` Linux x64 | ||
:link: https://github.com/crate-workbench/cratedb-toolkit/actions/runs/9826830191/artifacts/1674929097 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the approach to keep these links to release bundles up-to-date? I noticed it currently links to a specific GitHub Action run. Is there a possibility to have the artifacts as part of the regular release assets (https://github.com/crate-workbench/cratedb-toolkit/releases), so updating it here is just a matter of keeping it in sync with the latest cratedb-toolkit version number?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this is right on the spot. Currently, there is no solid approach yet, we just did the minimum things to establish a build matrix through a corresponding GitHub Actions workflow.
I've provided a relevant response citing you on the corresponding tracking ticket, so it will not get lost when merging this patch.
We will need to improve the situation with subsequent iterations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are some questionable (and partly also broken) queries on sys
tables mentioned (example: SELECT _node['name'], _node['hostname'], * FROM sys.operations;
). But since they already existed before, and this PR doesn't touch them, I'm ok with merging and doing another iteration.
The number may change any day, and is not of any value to readers.
704ee2d
to
30c894d
Compare
More details within the SQL statements in the |
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Utz <[email protected]>
30c894d
to
4b9fc77
Compare
Problem
When encountering troubles with CrateDB database clusters, for example by observing any anomalies, there is no clear and complete information publicly available about the whole procedure to find out about potential root causes and whatnot.
Solution
With optional tool support, let's improve corresponding documentation on this matter. This patch makes a start on it, and invites you to contribute and collaborate. Feel free to add patches, or share any suggestions which come to mind as we go.
Preview
Before vs. after.
/cc @karynzv, @hlcianfagna, @hammerhead, @mkleen, @surister, @seut, @proddata, @simonprickett