Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: Consumer chain validators are not as expected for top N = 100 #2169

Closed
p-offtermatt opened this issue Aug 23, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2168
Closed

Bug: Consumer chain validators are not as expected for top N = 100 #2169

p-offtermatt opened this issue Aug 23, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2168
Labels
source: devnet To indicate an issue surfaced in a devnet. type: bug Issues that need priority attention -- something isn't working

Comments

@p-offtermatt
Copy link
Contributor

Problem

Bug reported by @fastfadingviolets via Slack

In the test scenario presented in the new e2e test, namely:

provider chain with max_validators=5, max_provider_consensus_validators=4
validators with powers 30, 29, 20, 10, 7, 4
a consumer chain with top N=100
then validators 30, 29, 20, 10 should have to validate on the consumer chain.

The previous behaviour was that validator 10 did not have to validate, and only 30, 29, and 20 had to validate.

@p-offtermatt p-offtermatt added type: bug Issues that need priority attention -- something isn't working source: devnet To indicate an issue surfaced in a devnet. labels Aug 23, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🩹 F1: Triage in Cosmos Hub Aug 23, 2024
@mpoke mpoke moved this from 🩹 F1: Triage to 👀 F3: InReview in Cosmos Hub Aug 23, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 F3: InReview to 👍 F4: Assessment in Cosmos Hub Aug 23, 2024
@mpoke mpoke moved this from 👍 F4: Assessment to ✅ Done in Cosmos Hub Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
source: devnet To indicate an issue surfaced in a devnet. type: bug Issues that need priority attention -- something isn't working
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant