From a4ed6973dc6fa70f077a3069bd7278ead7184d09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: insumity Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:47:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix markdown links --- .../adrs/adr-005-cryptographic-equivocation-verification.md | 3 +-- docs/docs/validators/overview.md | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/docs/adrs/adr-005-cryptographic-equivocation-verification.md b/docs/docs/adrs/adr-005-cryptographic-equivocation-verification.md index d4f9bd2bf8..7c2bd34cdd 100644 --- a/docs/docs/adrs/adr-005-cryptographic-equivocation-verification.md +++ b/docs/docs/adrs/adr-005-cryptographic-equivocation-verification.md @@ -138,8 +138,7 @@ either using its infraction height or its unsigned timestamp. Note that changes The underlying reason is that a malicious validator could take advantage of getting tombstoned to avoid being slashed on the provider ([see comment](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/pull/1232#issuecomment-1693127641)). -- Currently, the endpoint can only handle _equivocation_ light client attacks. This is because the _lunatic_ attacks require the endpoint to possess the ability to dissociate which header is conflicted or trusted upon receiving a misbehavior message. Without this information, it's not possible to extract the Byzantine validators from the conflicting headers (see [comment](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/pull/826#discussion_r1268668684)). In addition, "amnesia" attacks are ignored, similar to CometBFT (see [ADR-056](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/blob/main/docs/architecture/tendermint-core/adr-056-light-client-amnesia-attacks.md#decision)). - +- Currently, the endpoint can only handle _equivocation_ light client attacks. This is because the _lunatic_ attacks require the endpoint to possess the ability to dissociate which header is conflicted or trusted upon receiving a misbehavior message. Without this information, it's not possible to extract the Byzantine validators from the conflicting headers (see [comment](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/pull/826#discussion_r1268668684)). In addition, "amnesia" attacks are ignored, similar to CometBFT (see [ADR-056](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/blob/main/docs/references/architecture/tendermint-core/adr-056-light-client-amnesia-attacks.md#decision)). ## Consequences diff --git a/docs/docs/validators/overview.md b/docs/docs/validators/overview.md index 4cac6e9582..4ef1e06422 100644 --- a/docs/docs/validators/overview.md +++ b/docs/docs/validators/overview.md @@ -100,6 +100,6 @@ For more information check out the [Key assignment overview and guide](../featur ## References: - [Cosmos Hub Validators FAQ](https://hub.cosmos.network/main/validators/validator-faq.html) -- [Cosmos Hub Running a validator](https://hub.cosmos.network/main/validators/validator-setup.html) +- [Cosmos Hub Running a validator](https://hub.cosmos.network/validators/validator-setup) - [Startup Sequence](https://github.com/cosmos/testnets/blob/master/replicated-security/CONSUMER_LAUNCH_GUIDE.md#chain-launch) -- [Submit Unjailing Transaction](https://hub.cosmos.network/main/validators/validator-setup.html#unjail-validator) +- [Submit Unjailing Transaction](https://hub.cosmos.network/validators/validator-setup#edit-validator-description)