From 2d7a831af98c0bdaa0ffcb466c7ea4a1cf8274f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Offtermatt Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 11:10:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add negative consequence --- docs/docs/adrs/adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/docs/docs/adrs/adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md b/docs/docs/adrs/adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md index 154e7e66c5..617546adb6 100644 --- a/docs/docs/adrs/adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md +++ b/docs/docs/adrs/adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ For validators in the active set, we typically assume that if they would misbeha #### Additional negative consequences * Validators outside of the active set become bonded, even if they are not validating on any consumer chains +* This will impact how future modules are integrated, since we will need to consider whether those modules should consider the consensus validators or the bonded validators (which other modules might assume to be the same) ### Neutral