You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to be an issue with the Axis of the Wheel Joint; it doesn't behave like a pivot as the documentation describes. Specifically, it doesn't work when you set the axis to 0, 1:
Even when you set the springFrequency value higher, the issue becomes more complex.
When I change the axis value to 0, 30, the issue is temporarily resolved, but it's still unstable and difficult to predict accurately when you change the two parameters springDampingRatio and springFrequency.
Additionally, there's an issue where setting the axis value too high will break the physics system.
I've seen a //TODO command in Rtt_LuaLibPhysics.cpp, which might be referring to this issue.
A solution has been suggested in #641 , and I've tested it, and it works well.
But this means that previous projects using the Wheel Joint need to adjust their initialization parameters.
There seems to be an issue with the Axis of the Wheel Joint; it doesn't behave like a pivot as the documentation describes. Specifically, it doesn't work when you set the axis to 0, 1:
Trucker.-.Solar2D.Simulator.2024-05-06.13-46-55.mp4
Even when you set the springFrequency value higher, the issue becomes more complex.
When I change the axis value to 0, 30, the issue is temporarily resolved, but it's still unstable and difficult to predict accurately when you change the two parameters springDampingRatio and springFrequency.
Additionally, there's an issue where setting the axis value too high will break the physics system.
Trucker.-.Solar2D.Simulator.2024-05-06.13-56-01.mp4
I've seen a //TODO command in Rtt_LuaLibPhysics.cpp, which might be referring to this issue.
A solution has been suggested in #641 , and I've tested it, and it works well.
But this means that previous projects using the Wheel Joint need to adjust their initialization parameters.
@Shchvova , what do you think about this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: