Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2.0 support #14

Open
H-Plus-Time opened this issue May 12, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

2.0 support #14

H-Plus-Time opened this issue May 12, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@H-Plus-Time
Copy link

With the imminent release of Polymer 2.0 (currently in Release Candidate), its probably time to consider porting over file-fire. I've forked the repository and begun work on that (I'll submit a PR by the end of the weekend), however I'd like to clarify what direction the maintainers would like to take in terms of the upgrade path (detailed in Polymer 2.0 Upgrade Guide). Either way, hybrid or class-based, the conversion doesn't take that long for single elements.

@sbeleidy
Copy link
Member

I think initially we'd like to switch to hybrid and maybe later look at full polymer 2 support.

Thanks for taking this on!

@H-Plus-Time
Copy link
Author

Oops, evidently Github doesn't allow for 'please add this branch to the base repo', that's actually what I meant :S.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants