You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be an option to have the data in a Galaxt data table (.loc file etc) directory. In particular if there are multiple possible models available. Then we could also remove the reference to __tool_data_directory__
Does one call of the python script maybe generate multiple calls to cfm-id. I'm just guessing here. Could allow for some paralellization, eg on Galaxy side.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be an option to have the data in a Galaxt data table (.loc file etc) directory. In particular if there are multiple possible models available. Then we could also remove the reference to
__tool_data_directory__
cfm-galaxy/tools/cfm/cfmid.xml
Line 8 in 9f20359
Also allow users to update their own models could be nice.
I think that a for details of the python script should be documented in the help section: eg
cfm-galaxy/tools/cfm/cfmid.py
Line 50 in 9f20359
cfm-galaxy/tools/cfm/cfmid.py
Line 65 in 9f20359
You should check the return code of this
cfm-galaxy/tools/cfm/cfmid.py
Line 94 in 9f20359
Does one call of the python script maybe generate multiple calls to cfm-id. I'm just guessing here. Could allow for some paralellization, eg on Galaxy side.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: