-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Find missing expungability data and join to existing charges data on github #155
Comments
My interpretation of the statutes (https://malegislature.gov/Laws/SessionLaws/Acts/2018/Chapter69, section 100J-K primarily) is that the default status is for offenses to be eligible for expungement unless explicitly listed in section 100J as ineligible. We may want to pare this sheet down to offenses we are not yet sure about from Sana or other trusted sources, fill in missing information with the information on eligibility, and highlight cases we are most unsure about. For example, I would feel confident that marine fishing violations don't meet any of the exclusion criteria for expungable offenses. We may want to make a (short) list of items to run by the partners. |
I marked all of the charges from chapter 265 as eligible for expungement since they did not match any of the ineligible parts of chapter 265 and none were felonies. |
@laurafeeney will:
|
|
Next steps:
|
See thread on https://cfb-public.slack.com/archives/CPP9PAWH3/p1597192452010600 for ongoing conversation related to acquiring parts of the original Suffok data |
We updated the crime list in part manually, and in part through the R files in |
issue #171 resolved whether we should include the 'violations', ie, CMR offenses. We should drop them from the dataset entirely. Data are joined in: Middlesex: Middlesex_Clean and Suffolk & Northwestern: MA_Data-2_MergeCharges_alt |
Must be done before answering Sana's questions in #152
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: