Run3 bbH cards for producing bbHToGG samples #3774
Conversation
| define l+ = e+ mu+ | ||
| define l- = e- mu- | ||
| define vl = ve vm vt | ||
| define vl~ = ve~ vm~ vt~ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These can be removed as they are not used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dear @lviliani,
Thanks a lot for the detailed comments. As I mentioned before, the cards are the exact copy of what was used for producing Run2 bbHToTauTau samples, just that I have changed the beam energy.
I will remove these lines if they do not affect anything.
| lhapdf = pdlabel ! PDF set | ||
| 320900 = lhaid ! If pdlabel=lhapdf, this is the lhapdf number. Only | ||
| ! numbers for central PDF sets are allowed. Can be a list; | ||
| ! PDF sets beyond the first are included via reweighting. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a reason for not using the default PDF set? You can get the default automatically adding these lines:
'lhapdf' = pdlabel ! PDF set
$DEFAULT_PDF_SETS = lhaid ! if pdlabel=lhapdf, this is the lhapdf number
$DEFAULT_PDF_MEMBERS = reweight_PDF
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry for my limited knowledge on this part. Could you please explain me what would change if we keep it to default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With the default settings you get the recommended PDF sets automatically.
| set gauge unitary | ||
| set complex_mass_scheme False | ||
| set max_npoint_for_channel 0 | ||
| import model sm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would keep it like that as it was used also for Run2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks the same as the previous card, so you can drop it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can drop this card as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you need this param_card? What do you need change wrt default values?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same comments as previous run_card
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have kept the param_card and run_card for each contributions(yb2, yt2 and ybyt), even though they might be same. I did this so as to be consistent with what was done for Run2. Please let me know if the repeated param_card and run_card still needs to be removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, please remove all the duplicate cards.
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | |||
| import model HC_NLO_X0_UFO-heft_bmass_noyb | |||
|
|
|||
| generate p p > x0 b b~ / t [QCD] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
with the / t syntax you are removing all the diagrams containing top quarks. Is it intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it is intentional, anyway it does not restrict top quarks loops
Dear experts,
I have added the bbH cards for yb2, ybyt and yt2 contributions. The cards are a copy from Run2 but only the beam energy is changed to 6800.0 GeV. I assume decay products should be defined in the fragment file.
For the yb2 contribution, I unpacked one of the gridpacks of bbHToTauTau_yb2 samples and I found the proc_card (in folder
process/Cards/proc_card_mg5.dat) matching with SUSYGluGluToBBH process card. But there are also separate cards for 2017 bbH_4FS_yb2. Please let me know which one should be used.Please review the cards and mention any changes if needed