Replies: 2 comments
-
I think since it is still just a scalar function then that meets the scope of the project. We can have either a special node or simply a special function available to formula nodes, which can generate deterministic pseudorandom numbers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
This discussion was converted to issue #130 and implemented with PR #140 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi @nsmith- , all,
@lgray brought up the idea of going a step further in what is provided via correctionlib. One classical example of where one would profit from harmonizing is jet energy smearing, see e.g. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/JetResolution#Smearing_procedures
Depending on whether or not a genjet is matched (well enough) to a recojet, either the difference between genjet pt and recojet pt is changed or some stochastic smearing is applied. Ideally, the result would be reproducible, e.g. deciding on a standard way to calculate a random number seed (e.g. requiring event/lumisection as input).
Input would be:
recopt, recoeta, genpt, (info for random number seed)
Output:
smeared recopt
Would this still be doable and within scope of correctionlib @nsmith- ?
Cheers,
Henning
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions