From 8e0d902ee943284f870ec2429c8f0de1f3a8b765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: barlowrussell <69545573+barlowrussell@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 13:56:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update parameters.csv Updated description of "Is distinctness due to lexical replacement or phonological change?" --- cldf/parameters.csv | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cldf/parameters.csv b/cldf/parameters.csv index ef6d962..6e06f3d 100644 --- a/cldf/parameters.csv +++ b/cldf/parameters.csv @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ID,Name,Description,ColumnSpec five,What is the word for ‘five’?,, hand,What is the word for ‘hand’?,, colex,Is there colexification?,, -dist,Is distinctness due to lexical replacement or phonological change?,"For those languages that lack colexification, i.e. languages with value “lexically distinct” for parameter “Is there colexification?”, values for this parameter are “lexical replacement” or “phonological change”. However, some languages exhibit both lexical replacement and (partial) colexification; this is possible when there has been replacement of both ‘hand’ and ‘five’ such that the new forms are (partially) colexified: these cases are indicated by rows in ValueTable with an empty value and a comment “(recolexification)”.", +dist,Is distinctness due to lexical replacement or phonological change?,"For those languages that lack colexification (i.e., languages with value “lexically distinct” for parameter “Is there colexification?”), the values for this parameter are “lexical replacement” or “phonological change”. However, some languages exhibit both lexical replacement and (partial) colexification; this is possible when there has been replacement of both ‘hand’ and ‘five’ such that the new forms are (partially) colexified: these cases are indicated by rows in the ValueTable with an empty value and a comment “(recolexification)”.", repl_hand,Was there lexical replacement of ‘hand’?,, repl_five,Was there lexical replacement of ‘five’?,, hand_replacement,What replaced ‘hand’?,"Values for this parameter are descriptions of the most likely etymology (traced as far back as possible in the Austronesian family) given for the word in the language that came to mean ‘hand’; values followed by “?” are somewhat uncertain; and those followed by “??” are even more uncertain; when no likely etymology has been posited, then the value is given simply as “unclear” (with no preceding etymology). Values are batched into five different categories, referenced by the `Code_ID` column.",