-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
validate emissions data is correct #14
Comments
@derekeder Worked on this a little bit this morning. I just did some quick gut checks across this data source we are using here I noticed that in this data source itself, the Emissions by Sub Sector (which is what we are using for the charts) doesn't match the total across any of the states - for pretty much any of the years. Thankfully, these are not generally big differences. So yes, I can adjust the If there is one silver lining, it's that the I can push a branch over with the changed code either quick tonight or tomorrow. |
@swatland610 interesting, but good to know they're close numbers. Do you have a sense of how far off they are? 1% 5% or more? |
@derekeder nevermind! I found the magic combo to align it. Here's a breakdown of the columns we are using for our emissions data from this raw data. To equal the
Buildings
Transportation
Dumps, Farms, Industrial, Other
Just a quick note to call out that we have to explicitly exclude the This makes sense as:
The only one I'm not sure why is Anyway, I'll adjust the |
amazing |
closed via #15 |
According to the Draft Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2020 by the EPA (discussed in #10 (comment)), the total CO2e emissions for 2018 were 6,689.5 MM CO2 Eq:
Our US total for 2018 in https://raw.githubusercontent.com/chihacknight/state-by-state-decarbonization/main/data/final/emissions.json is:
"dirty_power": 1729.0
"buildings": 607.4
"transportation": 1963.6
"dumps_farms_industrial": 1845.7
= 6,145.7 (units?)
@swatland610 you mentioned that we are not including everything from our data source. Does that account for this discrepancy of 543.8 MM CO2 Eq?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: