You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
where {} would refer to the last element (i.e., the line).
Motivation
Although name: "my-name" would also serve for this purpose, I frequently find myself in a situation where I want to refer to the previous element as an starting point for the next element, and nothing more. Creating a label for this purpose seems an overkill and makes the syntax unnecessarily lengthy. I do believe that this proposal would make the typst syntax even more convenient. Regarding using "{}" or something else, it is opened to discussions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using version 0.2.2, it seems like the same name can be used multiple times in a context, and only the latest usage stays addressable. So as a stopgap you can give all elements the name "{}" (or even "") by default and address the latest unnamed element like "{}.30deg" (or ".30deg")
let line = line.with(name: "")
line((y: 10), (rel: (x: 10)), mark: (end: ">"))
line(".5%", (rel: (y: 10)), mark: (end: ">"))
I know that. The point of this issue is to propose making this name built-in so that we don't need to name all elements as "{}" or something. If you think let line = line.with(name: "{}") is already enough to address it, so I will close this issue.
Inspired by
()
for the previous coordinate, I propose anything equivalent to refer to a previous element. For instance:where
{}
would refer to the last element (i.e., the line).Motivation
Although
name: "my-name"
would also serve for this purpose, I frequently find myself in a situation where I want to refer to the previous element as an starting point for the next element, and nothing more. Creating a label for this purpose seems an overkill and makes the syntax unnecessarily lengthy. I do believe that this proposal would make thetypst
syntax even more convenient. Regarding using"{}"
or something else, it is opened to discussions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: