-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document the different branches and their workflows #251
Comments
That might actually be the biggest source of confusion. Both Celestia and Optimint use two different base branches, that may be updated independently, yet the default branch in the repo is for Celestia. What are our thoughts around splitting up this repo into |
John and I discussed this offline. We agreed there should be distinct branches for the Cosmos-SDK version used for Celestia-App and the version used for Sovereign Rollups that use Optimint. |
I like the idea of separate repositories to remove confusion. |
You cannot fork a repo twice in same organization - it is not possible to make new repo that is a fork of original |
You can, however, fork |
It looks like Rollkit maintains https://github.com/rollkit/cosmos-sdk so perhaps this issue can be repurposed to document just the branches used by celestia-app. AFAIK that's currently only |
Not documenting |
We use this repo for both the optimint and celestia forks of the cosmos-sdk, and to make it even more confusing we have important feature branches based on both of those (qgb, smt). We don't have good documentation as to which branches are used for what other than the names of the branch.
We should document the purpose, base, and status of each branch and keep it handy, perhaps even include this in the readme
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: