docs: add comments to distinguish between methods

[rach-id]

Overview

Since users might find it a bit confusing to know the difference between the two methods, I Added a comment to emphasize that difference.

Checklist

• New and updated code has appropriate documentation
• New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
• Required CI checks are passing
• Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or documentation updates
• Linked issues closed with keywords

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added clarifications on the verification process in the DAVerifier library, highlighting its scope and limitations.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update introduces a crucial clarification in the DAVerifier library, specifically regarding the verification process. It emphasizes that while the process checks the validity of proofs for certain functions, it does not authenticate these proofs to Blobstream. This distinction is vital for users to understand the scope and limitations of the verification process within the library.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
src/lib/verifier/DAVerifier.sol	Added clarification note on the verification process not authenticating proofs to Blobstream but checking validity for specific functions.

🐇✨
In the land of code and mist,
A clarification was added, not to be missed.
For verification's truthful kiss,
Does not to Blobstream's door assist.
But checks the proofs, as they exist,
Ensuring integrity in our midst.
🌟📜🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cee4724 and 31ed49c.

Files selected for processing (1)

• src/lib/verifier/DAVerifier.sol (3 hunks)

Additional Context Used

Additional comments not posted (3)

src/lib/verifier/DAVerifier.sol (3)

110-110: The added comment provides important clarification regarding the scope of the verifySharesToDataRootTupleRootProof function. It's clear and directly addresses the PR's objective of enhancing documentation to prevent misunderstandings about the capabilities of the verification process.

---

192-192: This comment, similar to the previous one, effectively clarifies the limitations of the verifyRowRootToDataRootTupleRootProof function. It's concise and contributes to the overall goal of improving documentation within the codebase.

---

242-242: The clarification added here for the verifyMultiRowRootsToDataRootTupleRootProof function is consistent with the other comments in terms of providing clear documentation on what the function does and does not do. This consistency in documentation helps in maintaining a clear understanding of the library's functionality.