Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fails to start Fedora 26 LXD images, missing SSH #42

Open
RAOF opened this issue Nov 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Fails to start Fedora 26 LXD images, missing SSH #42

RAOF opened this issue Nov 13, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@RAOF
Copy link

RAOF commented Nov 13, 2017

The Fedora 26 (at least) images on the LXD image servers do not come with openssh-server installed. This then causes spread to fail when it tries to mess with the ssh config and connect during image setup.

Assuming we don't want to hardcode the necessary ssh installation invocations in the lxd backend, maybe the lxd backend needs an extra setup step where the task can install the necessary packages?
RAOF added a commit to RAOF/spread that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2018
@RAOF
Fix Fedora images (Fixes canonical#42, Fixes canonical#44)
dbcafcc
RAOF added a commit to RAOF/spread that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2018
@RAOF
Fix Fedora images in LXD backend (Fixes canonical#42, Fixes canonical#44
7abf156 
)
@Saviq Saviq mentioned this issue Feb 7, 2018
Merged
RAOF added a commit to RAOF/spread that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2018
@RAOF
Fix Fedora images in LXD backend (Fixes canonical#42, Fixes canonical#44
326f35c 
)
@RAOF RAOF mentioned this issue Feb 22, 2019
Open
This was referenced Sep 8, 2019
Closed
Merged
RAOF added a commit to RAOF/spread that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2021
@RAOF
Fix Fedora images in LXD backend (Fixes canonical#42, Fixes canonical#44
bd9327b 
)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@RAOF