-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 488
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate bindingType
property (supported in Camunda 8.6+)
#4386
Comments
bindingType
property (supported in Camunda 8.6+)
Update July 24@jfriedenstab to clarify status of this issue / if it will make it before the |
I see that this is not implemented yet, so it's not coming as part of 8.6-alpha.4. I think it's quite unfortunate that the users can already use the new property, but are left in the dark about the support of the feature. |
I'm moving this to ready. |
Assigning @philippfromme as the assignee of #4385. Feel free to drop it if you don't have capacity. |
Thanks, @barmac! Is there any chance that this could be implemented in the next days, @philippfromme? Then we could still try to include it in the release. |
@jfriedenstab I'm on it! |
Great, thank you! 🙂 |
In that case, we may also include it in #4439 |
Yes, I'd like that. |
I've updated the milestone since this is shipped with the current release. |
Problem you would like to solve
The new binding type
deployment
will only be supported by Zeebe 8.6 or newer. Users should be warned if they're using the new binding type in their BPMN process, but have selected a lower execution platform version.Proposed solution
Add a new linting rule that warns the user if the binding type selected for a called process, called decision or linked form is not yet supported by the current execution platform version, for example:
A <Call Activity> with <Binding: Deployment> is only supported by Camunda 8.6 or newer
Alternatives considered
none
Additional context
bindingType
for called processes/decisions/forms #4385The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: