You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem description
There is currently no mechanism for API Producers (e.g. Operator) to communicate which optional capabilities/features/parameters are supported and enabled to API Consumers!
Possible evolution
A programmatic approach that is generic enough to describe Runtime restrictions imposed by an API Producer and exchange capabilities enabled based on end-user, network location/status, etc.
Alternative solution
There has been discussion around use of well-known URL.
Just to add a note, I realize this is a proposal for an API, and there will be a separate submission to API Backlog WG. However, I think it is a fairly general topic that will benefit the project/community at large so Commonalities group should review and comment.
Problem description
There is currently no mechanism for API Producers (e.g. Operator) to communicate which optional capabilities/features/parameters are supported and enabled to API Consumers!
Possible evolution
A programmatic approach that is generic enough to describe Runtime restrictions imposed by an API Producer and exchange capabilities enabled based on end-user, network location/status, etc.
Alternative solution
There has been discussion around use of well-known URL.
Additional context
Some of the recorded (open and closed) Issues that will potentially benefit from such a solution:
camaraproject/Governance#141
camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement#57
camaraproject/DeviceStatus#46
camaraproject/SimSwap#58
camaraproject/QualityOnDemand#173
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: