-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reverse indexes #10
Comments
As I recall the issue is that the so-called forward primer doesn't mean that it and its barcode are necessarily at the beginning of a read. The read might have been sequenced in the reverse so the forward primer/barcode is reverse complimented at the end of the read and the reverse or ending primer/barcode would be at the beginning of the read also revcomped. So we just need the normal representation of each and make revcomped versions inside the program to look for them at either end of the read.
You might try relaxing the matching requirements depending on the quality of the reads your have. Things have improved since the program came out in regard to nanopore base quality but still suffer some issues.
Hope that gives a bit of insight.
… On 10/19/2023 7:56 AM PDT sscoster ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm using minibar to help demultiplex ONT sequences with custom indexes. I have a few questions:
a) I believe the code searches for the reverse compliment so I only need to put in indexes in the 5'-3' direction into the reference .tsv file, is this correct?
b) I've noticed that when I also add reverse indexes (not compliment, just reverse of forward index, etc.), I also get reads assigned to samples. My question is, should I be adding in reverse primers to the .tsv file as well when I reverse the indexes?
c) If I get reads from using the reverse indexes, is there a scenario where I should be trying all combos (reverse forward index with normal reverse index, etc.)? My thought process is that if the indexes are found reversed, the primers would also likely be reversed so there is no need for all possible combinations.
I appreciate any insights!
Thanks,
Stephanie
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #10, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AELSO4PHFNWY5PDGE46CQVDYAE5QJAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6HLKCVKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZRHE2TENBWGQ4DCMA.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Thank you!
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 8:55 PM Jim Henderson ***@***.***>
wrote:
… As I recall the issue is that the so-called forward primer doesn't mean
that it and its barcode are necessarily at the beginning of a read. The
read might have been sequenced in the reverse so the forward primer/barcode
is reverse complimented at the end of the read and the reverse or ending
primer/barcode would be at the beginning of the read also revcomped. So we
just need the normal representation of each and make revcomped versions
inside the program to look for them at either end of the read.
You might try relaxing the matching requirements depending on the quality
of the reads your have. Things have improved since the program came out in
regard to nanopore base quality but still suffer some issues.
Hope that gives a bit of insight.
> On 10/19/2023 7:56 AM PDT sscoster ***@***.***> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm using minibar to help demultiplex ONT sequences with custom indexes.
I have a few questions:
>
> a) I believe the code searches for the reverse compliment so I only need
to put in indexes in the 5'-3' direction into the reference .tsv file, is
this correct?
> b) I've noticed that when I also add reverse indexes (not compliment,
just reverse of forward index, etc.), I also get reads assigned to samples.
My question is, should I be adding in reverse primers to the .tsv file as
well when I reverse the indexes?
> c) If I get reads from using the reverse indexes, is there a scenario
where I should be trying all combos (reverse forward index with normal
reverse index, etc.)? My thought process is that if the indexes are found
reversed, the primers would also likely be reversed so there is no need for
all possible combinations.
>
> I appreciate any insights!
>
> Thanks,
> Stephanie
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#10, or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AELSO4PHFNWY5PDGE46CQVDYAE5QJAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6HLKCVKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZRHE2TENBWGQ4DCMA.
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#10 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOUXBD6OBSJIXPJAHBEC323YA3DTHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6HLKCVKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONZVHEZDENJTGY>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'm using minibar to help demultiplex ONT sequences with custom indexes. I have a few questions:
a) I believe the code searches for the reverse compliment so I only need to put in indexes in the 5'-3' direction into the reference .tsv file, is this correct?
b) I've noticed that when I also add reverse indexes (not compliment, just reverse of forward index, etc.), I also get reads assigned to samples. My question is, should I be adding in reverse primers to the .tsv file as well when I reverse the indexes?
c) If I get reads from using the reverse indexes, is there a scenario where I should be trying all combos (reverse forward index with normal reverse index, etc.)? My thought process is that if the indexes are found reversed, the primers would also likely be reversed so there is no need for all possible combinations.
I appreciate any insights!
Thanks,
Stephanie
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: