-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create plan for Infrastructure Improvements Step 1: Create Roadmap #378
Comments
In order complete the individual tasks in the story a follow up discussion with Ian/Team would be necessary. |
Hi @ian-r-rose, Can you please look at the classification of the stories when you get a chance (especially the ones under Need to confirm if these are still relevant sections) ? Based on your feedback, it will be easy to clean up the backlog and prioritize the remaining ones which can be part of the near term roadmap, I feel. It is fine if you want to discuss these in our sprint planning meeting tomorrow. I hope there will be time to discuss these. |
Let's discuss in more detail during sprint planning! Some initial thoughts below:
Yes, I think these are still relevant. I think Kevin is actually interested in working on Okta+AWS in the new year, you might ask what his plans are there.
I think this one is superseded by #430 and other issues in the cost tracking milestone, and can be closed.
I think we can close this as not planned right now. We may revisit incident response at a later date, but for now we are not the long-term holder of critical infrastructure.
Let's close this as complete for now. We may revisit orchestration options at some point, but would probably start with a new set of tasks.
We can keep this in the backlog for now.
I think we can close this as not planned for the time being.
Curious what you think of this one @ram-kishore-odi. We've been using our module's URL in github (plus a commit hash) as an ersatz package for a bit. Do you feel that's working well enough? Or is it worth the effort to publish a more "official" package?
Let's close this one as not planned. We don't have much in GCP anymore. |
Thank you so much for your feedback @ian-r-rose ! I will act on the tickets as suggested Hi @ian-r-rose, with respect to 1. Should we create a terraform package for our Snowflake ELT setup?, I think using module's URL in GitHub (plus a commit hash) is working well enough for now. We can certainly think about creating an official package after the terraform snowflake provider becomes more stable or after the next major release like 1.0 or later. |
This can wait until Ian returns since he can help guide on what to prioritize here. Main pain points have been cost management and SCIM rollout (see OKTA related issues) so possibly focus there first, but confirm with Ian. The goals are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: