Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Choice of LZ220 might be bad #18

Open
fsh opened this issue Jun 3, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Choice of LZ220 might be bad #18

fsh opened this issue Jun 3, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@fsh
Copy link

fsh commented Jun 3, 2019

If you look at https://cloudygo.com/leela-zero-eval/eval-graphs it seems to indicate that net 220 was actually a false-positive promotion as it is significantly weaker than both nets before it and after it, so I think you would be better served with including one of LZ 223-226 as representative instead?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant