Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Odd looking radar plot in the interpretability notebook #10

Open
t-sanchez opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Odd looking radar plot in the interpretability notebook #10

t-sanchez opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@t-sanchez
Copy link

Hello everyone,

When reading through the interpretability of IQMs notebook (which is very insightful and nice to read!), I've been puzzled by the last radar plot (image below).

image

The red curve of the left plot looks oddly shifted to me. Shouldn't it go around/touch the center of the plot?

@neurorepro
Copy link
Contributor

@t-sanchez the radar plot is a collection of (angularly) equidistant radii. Each feature is associated to a radius, with:

  • the value shown along the radius (the further from the center the higher the value)
  • the label shown at the end of the radius

The plot you see is from connecting all the values with a straight line, and there is no reason for them to touch the center or go around it. Just geometrically, the plot corresponding to the most features (i.e. more than half the features) will go around the center because the lines will go around more than 180 degrees.

@t-sanchez
Copy link
Author

Hey @neurorepro,
Thanks for taking the time to reply :)

I'm not sure to understand your entire reply. What do you mean by

the plot corresponding to the most features (i.e. more than half the features) will go around the center because the lines will go around more than 180 degrees.

I'm still a bit confused, so let me specify my issue. For instance, I'm not really sure how to read the feature values for the red curve, because sometimes, it will have to intersections, and for other features, there will be no intersection with the red line. In comparison, this reads clearly on the second plot

radar

radar2

@neurorepro
Copy link
Contributor

neurorepro commented Feb 10, 2023

Hello @t-sanchez , features either have a positive or a negative sign, i.e. correspond either to the blue or red curve, so in the case "no value here" it is because it actually corresponds to a feature with a negative sign, i.e. belonging to the blue curve and not the red curve. Not sure if it is clearer ?

corr

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants