Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2b. verify if results from sphere to mesh is the same that results computed directly on sphere #105

Open
alexpron opened this issue Nov 29, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@alexpron
Copy link
Collaborator

The idea is to apply spangy directly onto a sphere where the curvature information has been mapped. There are tons of methods to map a mesh onto a sphere but ywe could use the one in Lefevre & Auzias, 2015 that can be implemented rapidly in slam
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01222933/file/74-Lefevre.pdf

@JulienLefevreMars JulienLefevreMars moved this from Todo to In Progress in Spangy integration Dec 1, 2022
@JulienLefevreMars
Copy link
Collaborator

Two conclusions:

  1. It is not easy to compare the numerical eigenvectors with the analytic ones because the eigenvalues are not unique (the eigenspace is degenerated).
  2. But we could use the inverse mapping to back-project the spherical harmonics onto the brain mesh and check whether
    a. the functions are (almost) orthogonal and
    b. they allow to obtain comparable results when looking at the spectral bands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants