Lora fp16 1.28s/it ... i think is a slow. #2409
Unanswered
salocinmad
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
Disty0 wrote earlier: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I check it.. and i think is a very bad ... Now im testing in a runpod with a 3090 TI, and i think i have some bad in my config... Some body can check my command.txt for check the values i use?? maybe i dont understan something and i put a incorrect parameters.. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi world. I need help
I have a windows 11 with 64 GB RAM, Nvidia RTX 3060 16GB.
Nvidia CUDA 12.4 Update 1 -> Installed
I get 1,3s/i (seconds interactions). I think this is a slow... becouse i view youtube videos go more fast with similar hardware specs...
Like i read, lora is more fast than dreambooth, but i get more speed in dreambooth with same parameters... I think i have a problem with something but i dont find it.
I reinstall cuda, previously I remove all system variables about CUDA
Lora [1.27-1.3] s/it (seconds 1 interaction)
Dreamsbooth [2.5-2.75] it/s (interactions seconds)
caching latents [4.2-4.4] it/s (interactions seconds)
Lora train screenshot
CuDDN files -> Installed via setup.py
bitsandbytes -> installed windows version
I try to train a lora
command.txt
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions