-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
C++20-ify #267
Open
voidanix
wants to merge
19
commits into
blue-nebula:master
Choose a base branch
from
voidanix:cxx20
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
C++20-ify #267
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also introduces a new "inrange" function, useful for future refactorings to std::vector
The mattrig macro expands the mw argument at one point into: if (curmat != MAT_WATER ? S_SPLASH2 : S_SPLASH1 >= 0) Co-authored-by: Robert Alm Nilsson <[email protected]>
There should be no reason to overwrite this as the C++ spec already specifies it. Compilers nowadays also gift us a dedicated warning for this kind of situation (-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant). Remove it and specify <cstddef> to still make NULL accessible.
This usage of volatile has been deprecated since C++20: use std::atomic in its place.
Deprecated in C++20
Enable new language features that allow everyone to write better, safer and faster C++ code (and not let the game die).
As of C++17, we can specify whether we want our switch cases to fall-through or not (in presence of a break statement): specifying these avoids unnecessary compiler warnings and makes the code clearer as to what it is doing. Specify the fallthrough attribute where needed and replace the comments that specify its explicit usage.
As of C++17, the STL already provides us with std::clamp which in turn makes the implementation here provided redundant and possibly broken: remove the implementation here defined and use the one provided by <algorithm>.
As of C++20, the STL already provides us with mathematical constants that make the macro-fied ones used in tools redundant and possibly inaccurate: remove our definitions of the macros and use the constants defined in the <numbers> header.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Includes #248 as it is pretty much required to not get spammed with
warnings: please review (and possibly merge) that one first.
This PR bumps the C++ version requirement to C++20 and starts using some
features provided by it: more refactorings thanks to the new version will
be coming later.
Because I am pretty sure that some people would absolutely be against this
(ahem) due to high compiler requirements, I propose creating a
cpp-next
branch so that users who want to contribute with modern code that takes
advantage of newer versions can do so, by pushing PRs against that branch.
CI will likely fail as the provided compilers are too old: all changes were
tested locally against GCC 13 and Clang 16.