You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note that some Unicode characters do not conform to the standard 2:1 height:width aspect ratio. Worse, the non-conformity is specific to individual fonts. See examples/unicode.txt.
Consistent aspect ratio in the incoming text rectangle is a hard requirement, regardless of whether a Unicode character is to trigger graphical output in the SVG, or merely passed through as text annotation.
So, there may be value in additional Unicode support, but how to adequately test against whatever fonts may be found "in the wild" remains problematic.
Have you considered limited support for reading and interpreting unicode characters?
U+00B7 middle dot could be used for dotted lines, instead of hyphen
Or, using math symbols: http://jrgraphix.net/r/Unicode/2200-22FF
U+22EE ⋮ vertical 3 dots
U+22EF ⋯ horizontal 3 dots
U+22F0 ⋰ dotted slash
U+22F1 ⋱ dotted backslash
Box drawing lines: http://jrgraphix.net/r/Unicode/2500-257F
(includes rounded conrners, diagonal crossover etc).
Unicode arrows: http://jrgraphix.net/r/Unicode/2190-21FF
Supplementary arrows A: http://jrgraphix.net/r/Unicode/27F0-27FF
Supplementary arrows B: http://jrgraphix.net/r/Unicode/2900-297F
(oh my eyes)
I realise that there could be no end to this, and "almost" with so many symbols and a fixed-width font, who needs SVG... (Me, me, I need SVG).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: