Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TAIR resolver doesn't work #1335

Open
bgyori opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

TAIR resolver doesn't work #1335

bgyori opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@bgyori
Copy link
Contributor

bgyori commented Dec 17, 2024

While reviewing #1294 I noticed that the resolver for https://bioregistry.io/registry/tair.gene doesn't work anymore using either the direct URL to the provider (http://arabidopsis.org/servlets/TairObject?accession=Gene:2200934) or any of the metaregistry-based providers.

image

The current website for TAIR lists an accession number for each gene but the URL by which you get to that page has a "key" parameter which is a different number. Still, trying to fix the resolver URL by using 2200934 as the key doesn't work. Does anyone know what the relationship is between the TAIR accession numbers and the keys that appear in URLs?

@nagutm
Copy link
Collaborator

nagutm commented Dec 18, 2024

On May 6th, 2024 TAIR announced that they are launching their new website. This new website affected the tair.gene, tair.locus and tair.protein prefixes.

For tair.gene and tair.locus, the new website preserves the 'TAIR accession' in the details page for each entry, however it does not seem possible to use this TAIR accession in any kind of URL to go to the page of the corresponding entry. The 'key' parameter in the current URL also appears to be unrelated to the old TAIR accession.

For tair.protein, the 'key' parameter in the current URL matches the TAIR accession exactly. The example below shows that the new website can resolve the TAIR accession number when plugged into the 'key' parameter.

The tair.protein prefix can easily be updated with the current uri_format from the new website, but I'm not sure if the other two prefixes should have their identifiers updated from the old 'TAIR accession' to the new 'key' parameter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants