Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable more powerful treatment specification in design() #5

Open
rogerssam opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Enable more powerful treatment specification in design() #5

rogerssam opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rogerssam
Copy link
Contributor

For example, enable entering factorial treatments with labels and levels straight into treatments =
For example:

design("crossed:crd", treatments = list(PD = c(200, 260, 330), Irr = c(20, 100, 180)), reps = 4, nrows = 6, ncols = 6)

Also, allow subplot treatments to be specified in the same way in split plot if desired.

@emitanaka
Copy link

I suggest to use switch for the internal function of design. I can do pull request for what I mean (with time permitting) if you are happy with it

@rogerssam rogerssam transferred this issue from biometryhub/BiometryTraining Jan 25, 2022
@rogerssam rogerssam added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants