You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wonder how hard it would be to implement ZIGDM in tascCODA? And if you have any plans adding it any time soon?
We work on the vaginal microbiome, which tends to have very low alpha diversity, do you think there would be any issues using tascCODA on this type of data?
Thanks again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @leighton,
thank you for your interest in tascCODA! We aren't actively working on implementing a zero-inflated version of the DM in tascCODA, but this is an extension that we might want to add in the future. Inference for this should not be a problem, but it is not straightforward to determine how to test for credible differences in presence and abundance of a feature at the same time.
As for your dataset, how many taxa do you have? If the number is not too high, tascCODA should still be able to find a good result. Otherwise, you can discard the most rare taxa before running tascCODA or add a small pseudocount (e.g. 0.5) to the zeros in your data.
Hello! Thanks for this amazing tool!
I was wonder how hard it would be to implement ZIGDM in tascCODA? And if you have any plans adding it any time soon?
We work on the vaginal microbiome, which tends to have very low alpha diversity, do you think there would be any issues using tascCODA on this type of data?
Thanks again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: