-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
4674 refacto classes etl #4675
4674 refacto classes etl #4675
Conversation
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…entation de la classe Cantee
42a9eba
to
86f3f38
Compare
…facto-classes-etl
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
J'ai fait un review assez "lite" - j'imagine avec un refacto tout va bien vu que les tests passent
macantine/etl/etl.py
Outdated
logger.error(report["tasks"]) | ||
return 0 | ||
else: | ||
return 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ce serait plus lisible de faire return False
et return True
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refacto faite : 7e53e77
No description provided.