Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 21, 2018. It is now read-only.

Latest commit

 

History

History
35 lines (27 loc) · 1.72 KB

readme.md

File metadata and controls

35 lines (27 loc) · 1.72 KB

2016 Campaign Tech

An entirely unofficial look at the technology stacks of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns

Results

You can see the full results in the candidates.csv file, but here's the overview:

Check Overall Republicans Democrats
www? 15/15 (100.0%) 10/10 (100.0%) 5/5 (100.0%)
non_www? 14/15 (93.33%) 9/10 (90.0%) 5/5 (100.0%)
https? 14/15 (93.33%) 10/10 (100.0%) 4/5 (80.0%)
enforces_https? 10/15 (66.67%) 8/10 (80.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
downgrades_https? 0/15 (0.0%) 0/10 (0.0%) 0/5 (0.0%)
canonically_www? 7/15 (46.67%) 5/10 (50.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
canonically_https? 13/15 (86.67%) 10/10 (100.0%) 3/5 (60.0%)
hsts? 3/15 (20.0%) 1/10 (10.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
hsts_preload? 1/15 (6.67%) 0/10 (0.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)
sitemap? 8/15 (53.33%) 5/10 (50.0%) 3/5 (60.0%)
robots_txt? 11/15 (73.33%) 7/10 (70.0%) 4/5 (80.0%)
humans_txt? 1/15 (6.67%) 0/10 (0.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)
proper_404s? 13/15 (86.67%) 9/10 (90.0%) 4/5 (80.0%)
dnssec? 4/15 (26.67%) 2/10 (20.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
ipv6? 8/15 (53.33%) 6/10 (60.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
google_apps? 2/15 (13.33%) 1/10 (10.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)
open_source? 6/15 (40.0%) 5/10 (50.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)

How the data is gathered

Site Inspector.

Is it accurate?

Your guess is as good as mine. Use at your own peril.